Jul 20, 2007
More on Harry Potter
- The New York Times reviewed Deathly Hallows
- JK Rowling and her publishers weren’t happy (neither was Leaky)
I don’t think anyone could say the review’s content ruined the book for them. If the New York Times obtained a copy of the book, how can you blame them for writing about it? Wouldn’t keeping quite to please a private company be bad journalism?
- I’ll be attending a local release party tonight
While I don’t know all the details, it looks as though it’s going to be pretty big. Check back early tomorrow for pictures, and I’ll post a review as soon as possible.
No Comments, Comment or Ping
Reply to “More on Harry Potter”