“The Kingkiller Chronicle, Day One”
ISBN: 978-0756404079 | Pages: 662 (hardcover)
Author: Patrick Rothfuss
Sometime last year, in a thread on the NaNoWriMo forums, a user commented that they don’t mind clichés if they’re done well and in a fresh way.
The “in a fresh way” part is obviously important here, but something about stumbling into a fantasy world that you feel like you know is kind of comforting. You’re already aware of many of its characteristics, rules and limitations - any small variations of the generic setting can be easily digested as you go along. If a wizard or elf or goblin or troll comes along, you immediately have some idea of what that might mean.
(These “preexpectations” all began with Tolkien’s Middle Earth, I suppose, and were reinforced by the numerous fantasy epics released since then.)
I mention all this because I think it’s one of the main reasons I like The Name of the Wind so much. It has a lot of the things that are unsurprising in a high fantasy novel - largely stereotypical inns and innkeepers, a troupe of traveling performers, a school of magic, an ancient evil - but it manages to remain original at the same time.
The first thing that sets it apart is the writing itself. It’s done in first-person perspective (except for a few interludes scattered throughout), something that’s rare in a high fantasy novel. Robin Hobb is another fantasy writer who seems to prefer first-person, of course, and her writing has similarities, though The Name of the Wind contains less narrative summary.
The Name of the Wind is also faster-paced, despite being 662 pages - something Patrick Rothfuss says was intentional:
I probably have a 100,000 words I’ve trimmed out of this book alone. Sometimes it’s whole chapters and scenes. Sometimes it’s just snipping a few unnecessary words out of a sentence. But the goal is always the same, make the book clearer, cleaner, faster.
Like Robin Hobb’s books, the story in The Name of the Wind is very much a character-driven one. Some people dislike the narrator, Kvothe (and, indeed, it may be difficult to enjoy the book if you’re one of them), but you can’t say he hasn’t led an eventful life:
I have stolen princesses back from sleeping barrow kings. I burned down the town of Trebon. I have spent the night with Felurian and left with both my sanity and my life. I was expelled from the University at a younger age than most people are allowed in. I tread paths by moonlight that others fear to speak of during day. I have talked to Gods, loved women, and written songs that make minstrels weep.
Oh, and let’s not forget that he’s rumored to have killed an angel on top of all that. Many of these deeds are left for later books in the trilogy, but Kvothe gets plenty of excitement in the first volume all the same.
Kvothe’s story begins when, as a child, he watches an arcanist call forth the wind; wanting that kind of flashy “storybook magic” for himself, he sets out to learn the secret of it. I liked that it started right at the beginning, and in my experience, giving a character some powerful desire is one of the most important steps to making them “live.” (Come to think of it, maybe this is what the characters in Labyrinth were lacking.)
Many of the scenes not only try to be funny but actually are, perhaps due in part to the author’s experience with writing a satirical humor column. Reading about some of Kvothe’s public performances as a musician had me giggling uncontrollably. (Literally.)
Speaking of performances, I loved that well-written songs, often rhyming, were included in the text and not conveniently passed over as so many authors choose to do.
Lest you should think The Name of the Wind is composed entirely of funny songs, I should mention that plenty of terrifying creatures populate the pages, too: demons of every sort, the Fae, and the shamble-men who roam fields in autumn, to name a few. But even as the people of different regions fear one or another of these beyond all else, all are laughed at in some other part of the world.
All except the Chandrian, that is.
The mysterious Chandrian are feared universally - and perhaps with good reason. Learning more about the Chandrian becomes another major goal of Kvothe’s, for other than the blue fire that usually surrounds their appearances, hardly anything is known about them.
And then there are angels. Just what we ought to think of them remains to be seen, but it’s clear they aren’t quite as, well, good as is usually the case. One irritatingly righteous story told by one of the characters bares a striking resemblance to the type of thing you find in the Bible of our world (and I find it hard to believe that wasn’t intentional).
Finally, on a slightly unrelated note, the sense of impending doom (or, if not doom, at least impending something-large-and-significant-and-quite-possibly-relating-to-the-Chandrian) was built wonderfully in the final pages. The climax and subsequent conclusion work surprisingly well, considering the trilogy was originally written as one book.
I should probably mention that I’ve read only a handful of high fantasy books, and I prefer other genres these days. The Lies of Locke Lamora, apparently a cross between Robin Hood and Ocean’s Eleven, is often compared to The Name of the Wind and is considered superior by many. I haven’t read it yet.
But having said all that, out of everything I have read, The Name of the Wind is my favorite high fantasy novel since Tolkien.
And including him is hardly fair.

A note on the type
The font in the books appears to be Bembo, but I emailed Patrick to ask how he liked to format things while actually writing it. I know it’s an odd question, but I love fonts and typography. Pat replied that he uses Microsoft Word, with:
Wider margins so I can write comments, Times New Roman so it’s easy on the eyes, and extra lines between paragraphs so there’s some pleasing white space to write in.
Text size is 12, single-spaced and with half-inch indents on the first line of each paragraph.
12 Comments
I haven’t read this book yet, but I did run across Patrick’s blog not long ago, and the writing there was so entertaining that I decided to order this book although I am decidedly NOT a fan of the genre. Anyone who enjoys his writing should definitely check out the blog at http://www.patrickrothfuss.com/blog/blog.html
I find his blog hilarious too. :) I’ve been a subscriber for a while.
Regarding the genre, well, I’m not a huge fan either, as I think I hinted at in my review - I enjoy fantasy, but I prefer other types of it. But there are a couple books in it that I’ve liked.
I have read this book, and i have to say, Name of the Wind is the best fantasy book i’ve ever read. I do hope publishers will let out the next two books in quick succession.
ehm…really?
I’m often a sucker for cheap fantasy, and this book was perfectly passable, but it seems to have been almost absurdly overhyped both in print and on the web. The narrative voice skitters about like a squirrel on acid: every few pages it cycles from epic to slapstick to breezy and back. As I read, I started making a habit of pulling out my pen and marking the places where Mr Rothfuss stopped writing, went to get a coffee, and returned with a sharply different mindframe and manner of storytelling. The protagonist is not very believable, and the plot is filled with forced moments…with the resources at his disposal, why was he compelled to burn the last of the denner resin? Why did he abandon the crossbow? And why, for the love of god, would a child who spent all his life on the road need a wise teacher to instruct him in the fact that *poison ivy can irritate your skin?*
The crossbow was broken
And burning the last of the denner resin was probably to draw the draccus close enough to the church so that he could squash it. Previously, he burned denner resin to get the smell in the air to draw the draccus… so likely that was the same reason the second time in town.
Man… Some people are so critical. Not all books have to be written in a style pleasing to the reader in order to be great works. This book is a fantastic ride. It’s not meant ot be stylized and structured. If it were, I think I would have found it eminently less believeable as a NARRATIVE. Go back and read your journals, you ignorant critics. Are they perfect in style and prose? Listen to a person tell a story in a bar or around a campfire. Is the cadence and rhythm smooth? Hardly.
What I love about this book is that the main character is just as flawed as any human on the planet. He makes blundering mistakes, just like a regular human. Bad split-second decisions are shown to have dangerous consequences, and Rothfuss captures that fact with style.
Being a narrative, the book has fits, and starts, and interruptions… I felt like I was actually sitting in the tavern listening to Kvothe talk. It was a great reading experience and I look forward to the week before the next book actually comes out, whenever that is, because I’ll be rereading the first book again. In fact, just thinking about it, I may pick it up again tonight…
Well, I’ve got to admit, this book caught me out - I actually picked it on the basis that it was that rarest of gems in fantasy - a standalone book. More fool me. Only just started reading it, but regardless of its quality I still wish it had been advertised as (yet again) a 1/3 of a book for £14.99. I think I’ve finally nailed down the fundamental difference between sci-fi/fantasy and fiction, and it’s quite simple. Pick ANY 30 books from a fiction shelf, and the same from a fantasy. Notice a pattern? Shuffle them up if not, and then try stripping out all books with words such as “part 1″, “part 2″, “trilogy”, “epic”, “series”, “saga”. There’s your fantasy. Simple really. I’ve been an (increasingly) reluctant fan of sci-fi/fantasy for 30 years now, and quite frankly I’m beginning to wonder if fantasy writers are capable of writing a standalone book. Accepted they need to make a living, but there are limits. I’ll continue with this book - I did splash out on it after all - but if I’d found it in a library I’d have dropped it like a hot potato by now. I’m certainly no writer myself, but do these people actually set out with the intention of creating a series of one sort or another before pen even hits paper? As an avid reader I find this pretty depressing, and often find if I do plough through a series that the quality frequently slides once a captive audience has been obtained. Enough ranting anyway - I actually find the story very good so far, and if you fancy paying £45 for the whole story I’d probably recommend it.
A thoroughly disillusioned and disgruntled sci-fi/fantasy fan :)
i think that The Name of the Wind is the greatest book i’ve ever read!!!! i think that kvothe is just as awsome as his name and that his story line couldn’t be better! i used to think that, as a major cat lover, The Warriors series was the best and no book would ever beat it out, but after about the first three chapters of this, it had already beaten it out! i CANNOT wait for the next one and i recommend this book for anyone who likes a thrilling adventure about a strong spirited, curios young man, with a broken heart and alot of dreams to fulfill!
oh come on. do you just wake up in the morning and think ‘ im gonna make a totaly arragant remark just for the fun of it ‘. and if you insist on marking your book every time ‘Mr Rothfuss got up and had a coffe’ then i am shocked you havent written a book your self, for you, master of all knowledge, seem to know an awfull lot about writting.
A tip then STOP WRITING UN-USEFULL REMARKS TO TRY AND SHOW OFF YOUR INTERLLECT.
this book is amazin ive read a large amount of books but this has to be one of the best-same par as pullmen- can’t wait for next book to come out.
I didn’t think that Lies of Lock Lamora was anything like The Name of the Wind. The Lies of Locke Lamora is nothing compared in my opinion and I think the style is actually quite different (Lies of Locke is a lot more light hearted - *SPOILER* even when some people die in the book I felt absolutely nothing)
There’s just something epic about The NoW which just isn’t found elsewhere.
I have to say that anyone that reads fantasy novels, expects a sequel. Trilogy, saga, etc.. If you are looking for a stand alone book you should maybe read children’s books. That way you do not have to think so hard or retain as much. ‘The name of the Wind” Can not and should not be summed up in 200K words or less. No great story should. Every beginning has an end, But it is not the end to makes a story great, It is the journey!.
I look forward to the next and the next and the next!!
6 Trackbacks
[...] the cover of Wise Man’s Fear by Patrick Rothfuss (the sequel to The Name of the Wind) just came out, and that was too exciting to not blog [...]
[...] the cover of Wise Man’s Fear by Patrick Rothfuss (the sequel to The Name of the Wind) just came out, and that was too exciting to not blog [...]
[...] the sequel to The Name of the Wind was pushed back to April 2009. Shit. The decision is understandable, and his blog has a rather good [...]
[...] Rothfuss (The Name of the Wind, Wise Man’s Fear) talked in a recent blog post about how thoroughly his book was revised, [...]
[...] of The Name of the Wind (a fantasy debut of 2007 that drew considerable attention and won the SF/F/H quill award), the [...]
[...] of The Name of the Wind (a fantasy debut of 2007 that drew considerable attention and won the SF/F/H quill award), the [...]